1/8/2024 0 Comments Anysend reviewThe promoted content is truly annoying and in some cases the users may find themselves bombarded by dozens of ads all at once. It is relatively easy to recognize the ads it promotes, because most of them have labels such as “Ads by AnySend”, “Brought to you by AnySend”, “Powered by AnySend” etc. The application utilizes various methods of online advertising that include search links, text links, video, product comparisons, product reviews, coupons, banners, and so on. Hence, we think that there is absolutely no reason to keep this application on your computer any longer and ,thus, it should be removed.ĪnySend has been developed to generate income for the developers and the third parties they promote. But it does a good job of annoying the user with advertisements. the users are unable to send any files of any size anywhere, because the application simply doesn’t work. However, the application does not deliver on its promises i.e. Their marketing slogan is “send any file, any size to anywhere”, which is set to target inexperienced PC users highlighting its ease of use. The application is promoted as a legitimate, easy to use, file sharing platform. It just can’t be the main lift and the BS can’t be replaced.Our researchers have categorized AnySend as a potentially unwanted program (PUP) that you should remove due to its unreliability. BSS is not just halving the demands of the BS, it’s an accessory exercise for the hip extensors. So, what does it mean? Well, if we want to understand exercises better, just relying on outcome measures such as the resultant GRF is a great start, but by for not everything. Joint displacement is nothing too interesting here, but in the BS, they got to about 105 degrees of flexion in the BS, so maybe they did a half squat after all and not just 90 degrees as they described. And that’s the peak moment, a very similar trend. Some are more hip or knee dominant than others when squatting, and we see that all the time. And with the BS, we see high variability between knee and hip, which makes sense. When we look at joint work, so moment times angular displacement, similar message. The most striking result is that the knee is doing nothing in BSS, not just on average but look at the SD. So, what was found? Impulse, so the summed moments over the whole repetition. The dependent variable was: impulse, work, moment, and displacement. But that’s a lot of assumptions already here, oh well. Well, let’s assume they did a correct job here. How hard can it be? The concerning part is that they did not mention any force plate equipment or how it captures kinetics. Is this even validated? But then again, it’s just sagittal plane movement. Kinematics, so joint angles, were tracked, which looks like a suit. The interesting part is how they quantified kinematics and kinetics. BSS and BS depth were set to 90-degree knee flexion – so above parallel for the BS. They standardized the BSS box height and stance distance. So, just because the external load is 50% in the BSS, the imposed demands are likely higher. We know from previous research that just halving the external load going from bilateral to unilateral exercises doesn’t translate into half the imposed loading. So, what was done? Twenty trained participants, with an average 1RM of 150kg, which translates to roughly 1.75x their body weight, come to the lab and do a BS at 70% and a BSS at 35% of their 1RM. While this type of research has already been done in squatting, I’m not aware of any studies investigating single-leg exercises via inverse dynamics. This gives us more insight into what the different exercises actually do and what joints they load. The cool thing about this study is that they look at joint-kinetics and not just the resultant ground reaction force. ![]() There is a lot of discussion amongst coaches around the pros and cons of unilateral and bilateral exercises and why some might be better than others. Or, in more general terms, single-leg vs. Today, we will look at this cross-sectional within-subject study looking at biomechanical differences between the BSS and BS. This is Dan with this month’s rant about how to better decipher research. Always Stay Critical with Daniel Kadlec Review 9 – How to Better Decipher Research (Part 1)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |